Digital forensics · Incident response · Cyber readiness

WHO WE SERVE / LAWYERS & LAW FIRMS

Build your understanding on evidence, not assumptions.

Digital records can change how you assess a matter—but only when you understand where they came from, what they show, and what they cannot establish. We help counsel preserve, examine, and explain the evidence behind the questions in a dispute.

WHY DFI

A technical partner for the questions in your case.

A disputed message, departing employee, or unfamiliar forensic report can leave you with more questions than answers. We translate the issues you identify into a focused examination: which records matter, how to preserve them, what comparisons to make, and how to present the findings for review. You receive an independent technical assessment—not an argument built to fit an allegation.

Engage us while the evidence strategy is still taking shape. An early scoping discussion can help you avoid collecting too broadly, overlooking a useful source, or commissioning a report that does not answer the real question.

WHERE WE CAN HELP

Different practices. Specific evidence questions.

We adapt the examination to the dispute, the available sources, and the role you need us to perform.

01

Employment & commercial disputes

Was business information accessed, copied, transferred, or discussed? We compare available computer, cloud, and communication records, testing alternative explanations rather than equating a single event with misconduct.

02

Construction & project disputes

Which version of a drawing, instruction, or project document existed at the relevant time? We connect authorized project records, email, attachments, and document history to help clarify a disputed sequence.

03

Family law

What does the complete conversation show? We examine authorized messages, attachments, and relevant device records within a defined period, preserving context without turning the examination into an unrestricted search of private information.

04

Criminal law

Do the technical conclusions follow from the material provided? We can independently review an extraction, report, or chronology, assess the underlying methods and limitations, and identify questions requiring further examination.

05

Estate litigation

What can document history and communications contribute to the disputed chronology? We confirm instructions and the authority for each source before examining estate devices, accounts, or supplied records.

06

Expert evidence & production

What will another reviewer need to understand and test the work? We agree report and production requirements, document our methods, and provide expert consultation or testimony where specifically retained.

THE WORK, MADE CONCRETE

From the legal issue to a testable question.

These are examples of how we scope an examination—not findings about a particular matter. We select sources after discussing authority, availability, and proportionality with counsel.

From the legal issue to a testable question.
The questionSources we may examineWhat the work can provide
Is this exchange complete and in context?Authorized device or account data, surrounding messages, attachments and available metadata.An organized conversation record, collection explanation, and identified gaps.
How did the document change?Collected files, available versions, email attachments and relevant system records.A supported chronology and an explanation of what timestamps do—and do not—mean.
Does the activity support the allegation?Relevant device, cloud and account records, compared with known business activity.Corroborating or conflicting evidence, alternative explanations and unresolved questions.
Can the existing technical opinion be tested?The report, underlying material, collection notes and stated methodology.An independent review identifying supported conclusions and material limitations.

COLLABORATION, WITH BOUNDARIES

Clear instructions. Independent conclusions.

Counsel

Defines the legal issues and instructions; addresses authority, relevance, privilege, and disclosure decisions.

DFI

Recommends a technical scope, documents collection and analysis, and explains findings independently of the preferred outcome.

Client or source custodian

Identifies relevant systems and records, coordinates authorized access, and explains operational context.

We agree the scope, authority, access, reporting, and responsibilities before the work proceeds.

WHAT YOU RECEIVE

Material you can evaluate and use.

We agree deliverables before work begins. The appropriate format depends on your purpose, the available evidence, and the engagement.

01

An agreed examination plan

Sources, custodians, dates, technical questions, exclusions, and the intended form of the deliverable.

02

A traceable evidence record

A source inventory and collection/handling documentation appropriate to the work performed.

03

An intelligible production

Selected records, conversations, attachments, or a chronology organized for the receiving legal team.

04

An explained opinion

Where retained, a report separating observations, interpretation, assumptions, and limits—with consultation or testimony scoped separately.

RELATED ARTICLES

Useful before you need us.

We share the questions and methods that can help you make a more informed next decision.

A USEFUL FIRST CONVERSATION

Discuss the evidence before deciding how to examine it.

A short scoping conversation can establish the useful questions, likely sources, and appropriate next step. Please keep confidential evidence and credentials out of booking notes.

Book a lawyer consultation (opens in a new tab)

Helpful information to have ready

  • The issue you need to establish or test—not only the allegation.
  • Relevant people, devices, accounts, date ranges, and any existing reports.
  • Upcoming deadlines, known access restrictions, and the expected production format.
  • Who can authorize the work and who should receive the findings.

Keep credentials and sensitive evidence out of the initial inquiry. We will agree a secure intake route if the matter proceeds.

Technical background & further reading

These independent references provide general background. They do not endorse DFI or define the scope of an engagement.