Digital forensics · Incident response · Cyber readiness

WHO WE SERVE / POST-SECONDARY INSTITUTIONS

Connect distributed teams to one coordinated response.

BreachReady provides retained incident-response specialists with priority support 24/7 from day one of an active agreement. We then prepare with your institution’s participating teams around research, teaching, administration and campus services, respecting the systems and responsibilities within the agreed scope.

DISTRIBUTED OWNERSHIP. SHARED COORDINATION.

Connect the institution without erasing its boundaries.

FacultiesTeaching & local systems
ResearchGroups & partner dependencies
Campus servicesOperational priorities
Institutional coordination

Central IT + leadership + advisers

Shared escalationSource-specific authorityAgreed scope
A coordination model; participating units and authority must be confirmed.

WHY DFI

Your response needs to reach beyond central IT.

A centrally managed service may support many departments, while a research group or faculty operates resources with different owners and providers. A useful plan makes those relationships visible. We work with your institution to identify the participating units, clarify who can authorize action, and define how information reaches the people making institution-wide decisions.

Retained specialists and priority support 24/7 begin on day one of your active BreachReady agreement. Planning and exercises then strengthen coordination across the participating units. Forensic examination still requires source-specific authority and agreed questions; central access does not automatically extend across the institution.

WHERE WE CAN HELP

Test the places where responsibilities intersect.

The institutional scope can be focused on selected services, units, and scenarios, then expanded by agreement.

01

A shared service affects multiple units

We help central teams and service owners work through the impact on teaching, administration, and campus functions. The exercise tests how priorities are gathered, reconciled, and communicated rather than assuming every unit has the same needs.

02

A research environment raises concerns

We identify the relevant owners, partner dependencies, and available evidence sources within the agreed scope. Research leadership and advisers determine the institutional and contractual considerations; DFI explains the technical evidence and limitations.

03

An event crosses organizational boundaries

A faculty, third-party platform, or distributed administrator sees part of the incident. We help establish the escalation route and the minimum information needed for central coordination without assuming one group can act for everyone.

THE WORK, MADE CONCRETE

Map the responsibility before assigning the action.

The map is useful only if the owners and dependencies are real. We build it with your teams and test the unresolved handoffs.

Map the responsibility before assigning the action.
Institutional layerWhat needs to be establishedHow DFI contributes
Central servicesIdentity, core platforms, response coordination and authority for shared changes.A structured planning conversation and response decision framework.
Faculties and research groupsLocal system owners, relevant records, operational constraints and partner dependencies.Scoped evidence questions and defined routes into the wider response.
Campus operations and administrationService impacts, essential functions, practical alternatives and communications needs.Scenarios that connect technical events with operational decisions.
External providers and partnersContractual contacts, available assistance, access boundaries and information handoffs.Documented dependencies and an escalation process to test.

COLLABORATION, WITH BOUNDARIES

Coordinate without pretending every team is centralized.

Institutional leadership & advisers

Set priorities, address governance and legal questions, and approve decisions across the agreed institutional scope.

Central and distributed owners

Explain their environments, confirm local authority, supply relevant context, and carry out approved operational changes.

DFI

Facilitates response planning and exercises, examines authorized evidence where retained, and makes gaps and limitations explicit.

We agree the scope, authority, access, reporting, and responsibilities before the work proceeds.

WHAT YOU RECEIVE

A framework that connects the people doing the work.

We agree deliverables before work begins. The appropriate format depends on your purpose, the available evidence, and the engagement.

01

Retained specialists from day one

Your active BreachReady agreement provides priority access to incident-response support 24/7, with an agreed activation route and included hours.

02

A scoped response framework

The participating units, decision routes, dependencies, and responsibilities covered by the engagement.

03

Cross-functional playbooks

Prompts and handoffs for scenarios that require more than one institutional team.

04

An institutional tabletop

A practical test of authority, communication, and priority-setting across the selected participants.

05

A visible improvement register

Unresolved ownership, information gaps, and agreed actions to strengthen the next response.

A USEFUL FIRST CONVERSATION

Make the institutional handoffs visible.

We can help you arrange retained response specialists, agree the participating units and bring the right teams into a practical annual readiness program.

Discuss institutional readiness (opens in a new tab)

Helpful information to have ready

  • Select an executive sponsor and the units that should participate first.
  • Identify central services, distributed environments, and key external dependencies.
  • Bring existing response arrangements and known ownership or authority questions.
  • Choose the operational or research scenario that would most benefit from a coordinated exercise.

Keep credentials and sensitive evidence out of the initial inquiry. We will agree a secure intake route if the matter proceeds.